No. 1538-A: Observations in relation to the motion to dismiss directed to the Jurisdiction of the Tribunal and powers vested in the Supreme Commander, Allied Powers for the Pacific

利用条件: PDM
IIIF

メタデータが似ているアイテム

No. 1538: Motion to dismiss on behalf of certain defendants directed to the jurisdiction of the Tribunal and powers vested in the Supreme Commander, Allied Powers for the Pacific

No. 1538: Motion to dismiss on behalf of certain defendants directed to the jurisdiction of the Tribunal and powers vested in the Supreme Commander, Allied Powers for the Pacific

No. 1551: Order dismissing motion on behalf of certain accused directed to the jurisdiction of the Tribunal and the powers vested in the Supreme Commander Allied Powers

No. 1551: Order dismissing motion on behalf of certain accused directed to the jurisdiction of the Tribunal and the powers vested in the Supreme Commander Allied Powers

Index of J.C.S. Directives to Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers

Index of J.C.S. Directives to Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers

No. 672: Motion to dismiss on behalf of the Defendant KUNIAKI KOISO

No. 672: Motion to dismiss on behalf of the Defendant KUNIAKI KOISO

No. 695: Motion to dismiss of the accused ITAGAKI, SEISHIRO. (Number allotted on 22 January 1947)

No. 695: Motion to dismiss of the accused ITAGAKI, SEISHIRO. (Number allotted on 22 January 1947)

No. 696: Motion by accused SATO, KENRYO to dismiss the indictment. (Number allotted on 22 January 1947)

No. 696: Motion by accused SATO, KENRYO to dismiss the indictment. (Number allotted on 22 January 1947)

No. 669: Motion to dismiss by the accused MATUI, IWANE. (Paper number allotted on 14 January 1947)

No. 669: Motion to dismiss by the accused MATUI, IWANE. (Paper number allotted on 14 January 1947)

No. 689: Motion by accused SHIMADA, SHIGETARO to dismiss the indictment. (Paper number allotted 20 January 1947)

No. 689: Motion by accused SHIMADA, SHIGETARO to dismiss the indictment. (Paper number allotted 20 January 1947)

SCAPIN-608: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH DIRECTIVES FROM SUPREME COMMANDER FOR THE ALLIED POWERS 1946/01/16

SCAPIN-608: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH DIRECTIVES FROM SUPREME COMMANDER FOR THE ALLIED POWERS 1946/01/16

No. 661: Motion of accused TOJO, HIDEKI to dismiss the indictment (paper number allotted on 13 Jan. 1947)

No. 661: Motion of accused TOJO, HIDEKI to dismiss the indictment (paper number allotted on 13 Jan. 1947)

No. 683: Motion to dismiss on behalf of the defendant ARAKI, SADAO. (Paper number allotted on 17 January 1947)

No. 683: Motion to dismiss on behalf of the defendant ARAKI, SADAO. (Paper number allotted on 17 January 1947)

No. 671: Motion to dismiss on behalf of the Defendant SHUMEI OKAWA. (Paper number allotted on 15 January 1947)

No. 671: Motion to dismiss on behalf of the Defendant SHUMEI OKAWA. (Paper number allotted on 15 January 1947)

No. 668: Motion by accused KIDO, KOICHI to dismiss the indictment at the close of the Prosecution's case. (Paper number allotted on 14 January 1947)

No. 668: Motion by accused KIDO, KOICHI to dismiss the indictment at the close of the Prosecution's case. (Paper number allotted on 14 January 1947)

SCAPIN-2142: AUTHORIZATION FOR DIRECT COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE JAPANESE GOVERNMENT AND FOREIGN DIPLOMATIC REPRESENTATIVES ACCREDITED TO THE SUPREME COMMANDER FOR THE ALLIED POWERS 1951/02/13

SCAPIN-2142: AUTHORIZATION FOR DIRECT COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE JAPANESE GOVERNMENT AND FOREIGN DIPLOMATIC REPRESENTATIVES ACCREDITED TO THE SUPREME COMMANDER FOR THE ALLIED POWERS 1951/02/13

SCAPIN-2170: AUTHORIZATION FOR DIRECT COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE JAPANESE GOVERNMENT AND FOREIGN DIPLOMATIC REPRESENTATIVES ACCREDITED TO THE SUPREME COMMANDER FOR THE ALLIED POWERS 1951/09/13

SCAPIN-2170: AUTHORIZATION FOR DIRECT COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE JAPANESE GOVERNMENT AND FOREIGN DIPLOMATIC REPRESENTATIVES ACCREDITED TO THE SUPREME COMMANDER FOR THE ALLIED POWERS 1951/09/13

No. 1542: Supplement to the general motion to dismiss on behalf of some defendants which was filed at the conclusion of the evidence on behalf of the Prosecution and renewed at the conclusion of all the evidence

No. 1542: Supplement to the general motion to dismiss on behalf of some defendants which was filed at the conclusion of the evidence on behalf of the Prosecution and renewed at the conclusion of all the evidence

No. 1550: Order dismissing supplement to the general motion to dismiss on behalf of some defendants filed at the conclusion of the evidence on behalf of the Prosecution and renewed at the conclusion of all the evidence

No. 1550: Order dismissing supplement to the general motion to dismiss on behalf of some defendants filed at the conclusion of the evidence on behalf of the Prosecution and renewed at the conclusion of all the evidence

SCAPIN-115: ANSWER TO PRO MEMORIA CONCERNING THE MEMORANDUM OF THE SUPREME COMMANDER FOR THE ALLIED POWERS ON REMOVAL OF RESTRICTIONS ON LIBERTIES DATED 4 OCTOBER 1945 1945/10/10

SCAPIN-115: ANSWER TO PRO MEMORIA CONCERNING THE MEMORANDUM OF THE SUPREME COMMANDER FOR THE ALLIED POWERS ON REMOVAL OF RESTRICTIONS ON LIBERTIES DATED 4 OCTOBER 1945 1945/10/10

No. 795: ORDER granting application of the accused OSHIMA, Hiroshi for temporary emergency parole, subject however, to ratification and consent of the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers and proper security measures

No. 795: ORDER granting application of the accused OSHIMA, Hiroshi for temporary emergency parole, subject however, to ratification and consent of the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers and proper security measures

352: "Report of the Education Exchange Survey to the Supreme Commander fro the Allied Powers" (The Education Exchange Survey Group, Tokyo, Japan, 17 Sep 1949) ; "List of USAFI Courses Related to Artillery Career Field" (Troop Information and Education Division, Office of the Chief of Staff, Department of the Army, 11 Aug 1949)

352: "Report of the Education Exchange Survey to the Supreme Commander fro the Allied Powers" (The Education Exchange Survey Group, Tokyo, Japan, 17 Sep 1949) ; "List of USAFI Courses Related to Artillery Career Field" (Troop Information and Education Division, Office of the Chief of Staff, Department of the Army, 11 Aug 1949)

Court Exh. No. 26: Communication made to The Netherlands Government on 3 Feb. 1922 by the Department of State of the United States, regarding the respecting by the United States of the rights of The Netherlands in relation to their insular possessions in the region of the Pacific Ocean. Described by Prosecution as "Identic Communication made to the Netherlands Government on 4 Feb. 1922, on behalf of British Commonwealth of Nationals and also 'mutatis mutandis' on behalf of other powers signatory to the Quadruple Pacific Treaty of 13 Dec. 1921" Court Exh. No. 27: Communication made to the Portuguese Government on 3 Feb. 1922, by the Department of State of the United States, regarding the respecting by the United States of the rights of the Portugal in relation to its insular possessions in the region of the Pacific Ocean. Described by Prosecution as "Identic Communication made to the Portuguese Government on 6 Feb. 1922, on behalf of British Commonwealth of Nationals and also 'mutatis mutandis' on behalf of other powers signatory to the Quadruple Pacific Treaty of 13 Dec. 1921"

Court Exh. No. 26: Communication made to The Netherlands Government on 3 Feb. 1922 by the Department of State of the United States, regarding the respecting by the United States of the rights of The Netherlands in relation to their insular possessions in the region of the Pacific Ocean. Described by Prosecution as "Identic Communication made to the Netherlands Government on 4 Feb. 1922, on behalf of British Commonwealth of Nationals and also 'mutatis mutandis' on behalf of other powers signatory to the Quadruple Pacific Treaty of 13 Dec. 1921" Court Exh. No. 27: Communication made to the Portuguese Government on 3 Feb. 1922, by the Department of State of the United States, regarding the respecting by the United States of the rights of the Portugal in relation to its insular possessions in the region of the Pacific Ocean. Described by Prosecution as "Identic Communication made to the Portuguese Government on 6 Feb. 1922, on behalf of British Commonwealth of Nationals and also 'mutatis mutandis' on behalf of other powers signatory to the Quadruple Pacific Treaty of 13 Dec. 1921"

Court Exh. No. 27: Communication made to the Portuguese Government on 3 Feb. 1922, by the Department of State of the United States, regarding the respecting by the United States of the rights of the Portugal in relation to its insular possessions in the region of the Pacific Ocean. Described by Prosecution as "Identic Communication made to the Portuguese Government on 6 Feb. 1922, on behalf of British Commonwealth of Nationals and also 'mutatis mutandis' on behalf of other powers signatory to the Quadruple Pacific Treaty of 13 Dec. 1921"

Court Exh. No. 27: Communication made to the Portuguese Government on 3 Feb. 1922, by the Department of State of the United States, regarding the respecting by the United States of the rights of the Portugal in relation to its insular possessions in the region of the Pacific Ocean. Described by Prosecution as "Identic Communication made to the Portuguese Government on 6 Feb. 1922, on behalf of British Commonwealth of Nationals and also 'mutatis mutandis' on behalf of other powers signatory to the Quadruple Pacific Treaty of 13 Dec. 1921"

Court Exh. No. 26: Communication made to The Netherlands Government on 3 Feb. 1922 by the Department of State of the United States, regarding the respecting by the United States of the rights of The Netherlands in relation to their insular possessions in the region of the Pacific Ocean. Described by Prosecution as "Identic Communication made to the Netherlands Government on 4 Feb. 1922, on behalf of British Commonwealth of Nationals and also 'mutatis mutandis' on behalf of other powers signatory to the Quadruple Pacific Treaty of 13 Dec. 1921"

Court Exh. No. 26: Communication made to The Netherlands Government on 3 Feb. 1922 by the Department of State of the United States, regarding the respecting by the United States of the rights of The Netherlands in relation to their insular possessions in the region of the Pacific Ocean. Described by Prosecution as "Identic Communication made to the Netherlands Government on 4 Feb. 1922, on behalf of British Commonwealth of Nationals and also 'mutatis mutandis' on behalf of other powers signatory to the Quadruple Pacific Treaty of 13 Dec. 1921"

Court Exh. No. 27: Communication made to the Portuguese Government on 3 Feb. 1922, by the Department of State of the United States, regarding the respecting by the United States of the rights of the Portugal in relation to its insular possessions in the region of the Pacific Ocean. Described by Prosecution as "Identic Communication made to the Portuguese Government on 6 Feb. 1922, on behalf of British Commonwealth of Nationals and also 'mutatis mutandis' on behalf of other powers signatory to the Quadruple Pacific Treaty of 13 Dec. 1921"

Court Exh. No. 27: Communication made to the Portuguese Government on 3 Feb. 1922, by the Department of State of the United States, regarding the respecting by the United States of the rights of the Portugal in relation to its insular possessions in the region of the Pacific Ocean. Described by Prosecution as "Identic Communication made to the Portuguese Government on 6 Feb. 1922, on behalf of British Commonwealth of Nationals and also 'mutatis mutandis' on behalf of other powers signatory to the Quadruple Pacific Treaty of 13 Dec. 1921"

最終更新日: 2025-04-04T01:00:18

登録日: 2025-04-05

No. 1538-A: Observations in relation to the motion to dismiss directed to the Jurisdiction of the Tribunal and powers vested in the Supreme Commander, Allied Powers for the Pacific | Cultural Japan